<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Appealing Republican Choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecosmopolitanblog.com/no-appealing-republican-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecosmopolitanblog.com/no-appealing-republican-choice/</link>
	<description>- It&#039;s my nationality, my philosophy... and my favorite drink!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CosmoChick</title>
		<link>http://www.thecosmopolitanblog.com/no-appealing-republican-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>CosmoChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astralmarketing.com/blog/no-appealing-republican-choice/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Albert, thanks for pointing out that i completely disregarded Ron Paul. I have to say, it&#039;s mainly because i don&#039;t know enough about him. But the secondary reason is this, and it&#039;s probably a credit to him: he is just not as visible as the other two. So he may have the purest of intentions and may be the most efficient and most promising candidate there is, but if his word doesn&#039;t reach out to the masses, then how are we supposed to know?

I know that he has a strong following and has a core, very loyal audience. But unfortunately (for us, bonus for him), he doesn&#039;t play the political game, and that means he&#039;s left in the dust. I strongly believe that presidential races are not won on merit alone (in fact, sometimes it doesn&#039;t even feature), and Ron Paul is the example... He has merit, valor, honestly and diligence, but he doesn&#039;t have the gift of the gab, the personality or the money to come into the limelight, and unforunately, that will be his demise, as far as his presidential hopes are concerned...

It&#039;s a great shame, I, for one, would like to know more about what he believes and what he stands for. But at the same time, like the majority of the people out there, i am not willing to do my own research and &quot;dig&quot; to find out, i want it fed to me. And he&#039;s not feeding me his views and beliefs. And this is reflected in the success (or lack thereof) of his presidential race.

-CC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albert, thanks for pointing out that i completely disregarded Ron Paul. I have to say, it&#8217;s mainly because i don&#8217;t know enough about him. But the secondary reason is this, and it&#8217;s probably a credit to him: he is just not as visible as the other two. So he may have the purest of intentions and may be the most efficient and most promising candidate there is, but if his word doesn&#8217;t reach out to the masses, then how are we supposed to know?</p>
<p>I know that he has a strong following and has a core, very loyal audience. But unfortunately (for us, bonus for him), he doesn&#8217;t play the political game, and that means he&#8217;s left in the dust. I strongly believe that presidential races are not won on merit alone (in fact, sometimes it doesn&#8217;t even feature), and Ron Paul is the example&#8230; He has merit, valor, honestly and diligence, but he doesn&#8217;t have the gift of the gab, the personality or the money to come into the limelight, and unforunately, that will be his demise, as far as his presidential hopes are concerned&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a great shame, I, for one, would like to know more about what he believes and what he stands for. But at the same time, like the majority of the people out there, i am not willing to do my own research and &#8220;dig&#8221; to find out, i want it fed to me. And he&#8217;s not feeding me his views and beliefs. And this is reflected in the success (or lack thereof) of his presidential race.</p>
<p>-CC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.thecosmopolitanblog.com/no-appealing-republican-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astralmarketing.com/blog/no-appealing-republican-choice/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>McCain would be a disaster.  He&#039;s a lunatic with PTSD disorder, a racist who calls Asians &quot;gooks&quot;. He wants to bankrupt America and keep us in a permanent state of war.  He&#039;s an adulterer, and he covered up his dope-addict wife&#039;s embezzlements.

Ron Paul is a man of Christ-like character, a true public servant, who has diligently defended the rule of law from corrupt politicians for decades, with honesty and high principle.  He&#039;s the only decent man in the race.  Huckabee calls himself Christian and talks about bombing Iran to prove he&#039;s manly.  That&#039;s just Satanic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain would be a disaster.  He&#8217;s a lunatic with PTSD disorder, a racist who calls Asians &#8220;gooks&#8221;. He wants to bankrupt America and keep us in a permanent state of war.  He&#8217;s an adulterer, and he covered up his dope-addict wife&#8217;s embezzlements.</p>
<p>Ron Paul is a man of Christ-like character, a true public servant, who has diligently defended the rule of law from corrupt politicians for decades, with honesty and high principle.  He&#8217;s the only decent man in the race.  Huckabee calls himself Christian and talks about bombing Iran to prove he&#8217;s manly.  That&#8217;s just Satanic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

